RF-EMF emissions from wireless phones are class 1 human carcinogens
Using the long-established and respected Bradford Hill criteria for assessing causality, this paper shows that RF-EMF exposure from mobile (and cordless) phones should be regarded as an IARC class 1 human carcinogen (cancel causing agent). Current guidelines for exposure need to be urgently revised.
Wireless phones, i.e. mobile phones and cordless phones, emit radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (RF-EMF) when used. An increased risk of brain tumors is a major concern. The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) at the World Health Organization (WHO) evaluated the carcinogenic effect to humans from RF-EMF in May 2011. It was concluded that RF-EMF is a group 2B, i.e. a “possible”, human carcinogen.
Bradford Hill gave a presidential address at the British Royal Society of Medicine in 1965 on the association or causation that provides a helpful framework for evaluation of the brain tumour risk from RF-EMF.
All nine issues on causation according to Hill were evaluated. Regarding wireless phones, only studies with long-term use were included. In addition, laboratory studies and data on the incidence of brain tumours were considered.
The criteria on strength, consistency, specificity, temporality, and biologic gradient for evidence of increased risk for glioma and acoustic neuroma were fulfilled. Additional evidence came from plausibility and analogy based on laboratory studies.
Regarding coherence, several studies show increasing incidence of brain tumours, especially in the most exposed area. Support for the experiment came from antioxidants that can alleviate the generation of reactive oxygen species involved in biologic effects, although a direct mechanism for brain tumor carcinogenesis has not been shown. In addition, the finding of no increased risk for brain tumors in subjects using the mobile phone only in a car with an external antenna is supportive evidence. Hill did not consider it was essential, or even very likely, that all the listed criteria were likely to be fulfilled.
Ref: Lennart Hardell and Michael Carlberg, Using the Hill viewpoints from 1965 for evaluating strengths of evidence of the risk for brain tumors associated with use of mobile and cordless phones, Rev Environ Health 2013-0006, De Gruyter; DOI 10.1515
http://www.powerwatch.org.uk/news/20131016-hardell-carlberg-papers.asp
CELL PHONE DIODES HELP MITIGATE THE EMFS... http://bit.ly/1cxTzda
Anti-Aging Lady 
Heya i am for the primary time here. I came across this board and I to
find It truly useful & it helped me out much.
I’m hoping to provide one thing again and help others such
as you helped me.
I do not know whether it’s just me or if everybody
else encountering issues with your website.
It looks llike some of the written text within your posts
are runing off the screen. Can somebody else please provide feedbac and llet me
know if this is happening to them as well?
Thiss could bee a issue with my browser because I’ve had this happen before.
Kudos
Thanks for the marvelous posting! I quiite enjoyed reaing it, you happen to be a great author.I
will always bopkmark your blog and will come back down the road.
I want to encourage you to definitely continue your
great job, have a nice afternoon!